KTNA Studio – Dave Totten, artist

Photo by Deb Wessler

Photo by Dora Miller

KTNA Studio

KTNA On Air Studio, Jan 2013

Photo by Deb Wessler

Photo by James Trump

Fish Lake morning

Fish Lake morning

photo: Robin Song

Archives

Public Speaks at Sunshine Clinic Board Meeting

by Phillip Manning ~ July 31st, 2013

Audio: 

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

On Tuesday night, the Sunshine Community Health Center Board of Directors met.  In addition to regular Clinic business, the Board allowed an extended period for community members who wished to speak to the recent dismissal of Medical Director Dr. Mary Loeb. Ultimately, no direct action was taken on the subject of Dr. Loeb or Executive Director David Bryant.

Before the meeting began, a rally was held on the bike path in front of the Sunshine Clinic.   Organizers say that over seventy people were present at the beginning of the rally, which was timed to coincide with shift change at the Clinic.  Rally organizer Mary Gunderson says that the mission of the rally was a positive one.

“My primary goal is that–it’s been brought to my attention that the staff is under a lot of stress.  It’s been a really rough month for them.  They just needed to know that they are appreciated, and there are people out here that are rooting for them, and try to bring something positive to a rather stressful–more than rather stressful–situation, and let them know that they’re not isolated.”

In addition to supporting current Clinic staff, many people present at the rally held signs calling for Dr. Loeb’s reinstatement as Medical Director.

Many of the rally participants also attended the Board meeting, which was held at the Assembly of God Church. In a departure from Sundays at most churches, the message came from community members seated in the pews.  Mary Gunderson spoke first, and criticized the decision of Clinic Executive Director David Bryant to dismiss Dr. Loeb.

“Some of us don’t have the luxury of waiting a couple of months while the Clinic regains its footings.  Shouldn’t the patients always be at the center of Clinic decisions?  To me, the decision to remove Dr. Mary did not involve consideration of patients at all.  I suggest that Mr. Bryant’s actions are at odds with what the Clinic staff and community have always promoted, serving the underserved.”

Gunderson called for Executive Director Bryant to be placed on a Leave of Absence while his decisions are investigated.  This sentiment was echoed by others, including former Clinic staff.  Duronda Twigg, a registered nurse, says that, because of Bryant’s actions, “The Clinic environment has become one of fear, distrust, and lack of leadership.”  Sharon Meals, former Executive Assistant to Mr. Bryant, accuses him of being deceptive in his removal Dr. Loeb.

“I have observed the E.D. spending an unusual amount of time working behind the scenes, enlisting a few staff members to join him in his pursuit of an agenda that did not have the wellbeing of the Clinic in mind, or consider the negative impact that such decisions would have on staff and, more importantly, on patients and the community.  I think you should consider the possibility that the Executive Director has deliberately selected, distorted, and framed the information you have received about Dr. Mary in order to gain your support in dismissing her.”

In total, over twenty community members spoke at the meeting, all of them critical of the removal of Dr. Mary Loeb.  The majority called for some combination of Dr. Loeb’s reinstatement or Mr. Bryant’s discipline or dismissal.

In response to the pointed criticism he received, Bryant says in a phone interview that hearing out this sort of community concern is part of his function.

“It’s pretty much the Executive Director’s job to take their lumps when something like this happens, and to not let their personal opinions interfere with trying to move the Clinic forward.  I can’t let those things be a distraction, even if I may disagree with them.”

In response to the allegation that he came into the Executive Director position with an agenda to remove Dr. Loeb, Bryant says that his primary driver is the Clinic’s wellbeing.

“The agenda that I accepted when I accepted the job was the agenda set by the Board, which is to do everything I can to make sure that the Clinic continues to exist in a healthy financial state, and that–most importantly–it continues to provide for the healthcare of the people in the catchment area.  That’s paramount.  There was no agenda.  I had no knowledge of the people here prior to signing on to the job.”

Bryant also discussed the plans for ensuring that services continue at the Sunshine and Willow Clinics.  He said at the meeting that the Clinic is still waiting for the new approval to dispense controlled substances, but that they can still be prescribed, and other prescription drugs can be obtained on-site.   He also says that the state-funded vaccination program will proceed, and that steps have been made to ensure the opiate addiction treatment program will not be interrupted.

The Sunshine Community Health Center Board entered executive session for just under two hours, then tabled the majority of the agenda.  No action was taken regarding Dr. Loeb or Mr. Bryant.

3 Responses to Public Speaks at Sunshine Clinic Board Meeting

  1. The Irishman

    In this latest installment of fantasy, Mr Bryant would once again have us believe that all is well at the Clinic under his administration and no one is being adversely affected by his novel style of management. This is of course in direct contrast to the twenty some people who spoke at last night’s meeting, not one of whom even remotely supported Mr Bryant. One would think that after all who spoke, accusing him of mismanagement and asking for his dismissal, he would perhaps get the message he was wrong and endeavor to change. Clearly that is not so judging by his response this evening, which by the way was a very calm and polished if not necessarily factual reply. So polished in fact that I would guess that Mr Bryant has been down this road before, as most people would have found this sort of overwhelmingly negative community response devastating. It’s obvious he doesn’t see the error in his ways and has no desire to change. With this in mind and with the fact that the Clinic seemed to be doing quite well before his arrival, I cannot imagine any solution other than his removal. At this time, we all need to exercise patience, especially the Staff who are under extreme duress, while the Board of Directors work through the necessary process of removing Mr Bryant. Please let the Staff and Board know how much you value them and finally, Mr Bryant, if you are reading this post, please do the right thing and resign before you inflict more damage.

  2. Grete Perkins

    Mr. Bryant’s response shows a remarkable amount of cluelessness. The people who spoke against his actions Tuesday night included the current chair of the Talkeetna Community Council, a former chair of the Talkeetna Community Council, the Talkeetna Elementary School Principal, the President of the Talkeetna Elementary PTA, a former Mat-Su School District Board member, Mr. Bryant’s former executive assistant, several lifelong area residents who have a tremendous amount of local knowledge and respect, many other 20+ year residents of the community, and many of the clinic’s patients! These are not random people who voiced opinions, these are community leaders and the people that the clinic is supposed to serve. Mr. Bryant stated that “It’s pretty much the Executive Director’s job to take their lumps when something like this happens.” These were more than lumps, Mr. Bryant. These were calls for your dismissal!

  3. John Loomis

    The community needs to keep up with this issue. While it is clear an injustice has occurred, it would turn into a travesty if we allowed this to fade away without resolution. Why hasn’t Mr. Bryant presented any documentation or evidence that would support his actions? Dr. Loeb is a member of our community who has not been allowed to confront her accuser or defend herself from slander. After all this Mr. Bryant will never be accepted in our community, so if Mr. Bryant’s “…primary driver is the Clinic’s wellbeing.” then maybe he should resign and move elsewhere. Honestly, by categorizing an entire community’s concern as a mere “distraction” Mr. Bryant is demonstrating that he is not in touch with reality or does not understand the definition of the word.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin