KTNA Studio – Dave Totten, artist

Photo by Deb Wessler

Photo by Dora Miller

KTNA Studio

KTNA On Air Studio, Jan 2013

Photo by Deb Wessler

Photo by James Trump

Fish Lake morning

Fish Lake morning

photo: Robin Song

Archives

Litigation Blamed for Port MacKenzie Rail Spur Delays

by Phillip Manning ~ August 8th, 2014

by:  Ellen Lockyer, KSKA – Anchorage

Construction of the railroad link between the Matanuska-Susitna Borough city of Houston and Port MacKenzie is over budget and way behind schedule. Borough officials blame litigation for the delays.

 

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

At Tuesday night’s Mat Su Borough Assembly meeting, Joe Perkins, the Borough’s executive for the rail extension project, updated earlier financial data on the cost overruns beyond the initial $272 million  pricetag.

“When you add all this up, it totals about $31 million. So if you take $ 272 .5 and add $31 (million) to it,  you get a total project cost now of  $303. 5. (million)”

 The project linking Port MacKenzie with the AK Railroad main line near Houston started in 2008, and Perkins said the way it has been funded, by legislative appropriations over the years, has not helped keep costs down.

”We had intended to have the train running by now, had we received sufficient funding to do that. So, we have had some impacts from delays in funding. Our construction management people are having to stay a considerable number of years past what we have anticipated, same thing with our engineering people. So, again, the way this thing has been funded with eight different appropriations and some more to come, has certainly increased our costs.”

 He told the Assembly that work on some of the six construction segments of the railroad spur are done or near completion. Segment 1 at Port MacKenzie, segment 3 in the middle and segment 6 near Houston are finished. Segment 4 should be done next year, but segment 5, which crosses privately owned land, is being put off until negotiations for a Right of Way are complete. The money appropriated for that segment will be put into producing “ballast” or rock bed material for the entire rail spur.

 Possibly a major cause of the cost overruns, according to Perkins, are delays caused by litigation against the spur’s construction by environmental organizations Cook Inletkeeper and Sierra Club. The lawsuits caused the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to issue a stop work order on the spur, which added to the contractor and engineer costs.

”The number on the ongoing construction, which we can prove, is $5  million. The legal costs were somewhere around $1.5 million. We were represented by DC attorneys, and they’re expensive. “

The Ninth Circuit has since given the go-ahead for the project.

 Federal Surface Transportation Board regulations regarding the relocation of trails in the area added an additional one million dollars to costs, and a five percent Borough finance administration charge also upped the total  of building the railroad spur.

The additional costs will add about three and a half million dollars to the Borough’s request for a legislative appropriation of $116 million  for next year to complete work on the spur. Perkins told the body that nearly $120 million is needed to finish the project by late 2017.

1 Response to Litigation Blamed for Port MacKenzie Rail Spur Delays

  1. Mike Stoltz

    The article in the ADN as stated by Nick Spiropoulos, borough attorney, mentioned the added costs and delays to the rail link were the borough’s own ineptness and the lack of proper planning by Mat Su Borough Staff, to get requisite permits to cross Department of Natural Resources Lands.

    The project also still faces right-of-way negotiations with one property owner which has pushed back work on that section another year.

    The problem with the rail link is lack of proper and thorough planning.

    Iditarod Guy stated the problems best:
    ” Classic example of project proponents ignoring legal requirements and selling this project on wildly unrealistic low construction costs that ignored the need for continuous public trail access for the dozens of trails from Knik to the Big Su River that would have otherwise been blocked until the Surface Transportation Board intervened. Then they have the gall to blame the public for these delays, when a competent project manager would have taken them into account from the outset. But a competent project manager wouldn’t be building this railroad to nowhere, as it’s just socialism for construction and engineering firms, and will never make enough money to justify it’s construction (read the feasibility report by the Surface Transporation Board, a federal pro-RR group of commissioners who have oversight on federal spending for RR’s. They dished the project, and found it to have numerous discrepancies. to the point that one of the three comissioners voted against it. Yahoo MatSu! This is why have a multi-trillion dollar debt in this country!”

Leave a Reply

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin