KTNA Studio – Dave Totten, artist

Photo by Deb Wessler

Photo by Dora Miller

KTNA Studio

KTNA On Air Studio, Jan 2013

Photo by Deb Wessler

Photo by James Trump

Fish Lake morning

Fish Lake morning

photo: Robin Song

Archives

Borough Assembly Will Meet Again on a $12m Question

by Phillip Manning ~ August 13th, 2014

On Tuesday, the Mat-Su Borough Assembly met to discuss a letter from the Federal Transit Authority asking for repayment of $12 million in grant funds.  That money was used to fund a ferry project between Port MacKenzie and Anchorage that was never completed. Most of Tuesday’s meeting took place in executive session.  The Assembly decided to hold another meeting on August 21st to continue the discussion.  Deputy Mayor Ronald Arvin says the Assembly needs to know more before making a decision on how to respond to the FTA letter.

“There are several potential solutions and responses to that, so we’ve asked staff to put together some additional information, because we couldn’t arrive at a conclusion without knowing some additional details, and that will be the basis of the [August 21st] meeting.”

Jim Sykes, who represents District 1 of the borough, says that it’s important that borough residents are made aware of the potential cost.

“As we explore these things, these options, and they’re in executive session, I think the public should at least be able to know what the total liability could be if we have to pay the full bill.”

Assembly Member Vern Halter, whose district includes the Upper Valley, says he was skeptical of the ferry plan years ago, and that he is frustrated with the current situation.

“It seems like were kind of locked into a situation where we can’t perform, because we can’t take the ferry across to another city that just hasn’t been very cooperative in letting us have a landing.  So, it’s just been physically impossible–and the demand letter says, ‘You guys are not providing ferry service.’  That just irks me to no end.”

Because executive sessions are off-limits to the public, the full slate of options is unknown.  Multiple mentions of a legal plan were made on Tuesday, and it’s even possible the borough could file litigation of its own.  Whether that’s likely or not, and what other alternatives might exist, is a question that will not be answered until after next week’s closed-door meeting.  The borough has until early next month to respond or else risk accruing interest on the funds.

1 Response to Borough Assembly Will Meet Again on a $12m Question

  1. Mike Stoltz

    Based on Vern Halters, our areas Mat Su Assemblyman’s quoted comments in this article, I do believe Mr. Halter has absolutely no concept how to take responsibility for the decisions he makes representing us on the Mat Su Assembly.

    “we can’t take the ferry across to another city that just hasn’t been very cooperative in letting us have a landing. So, it’s just been physically impossible–and the demand letter says, ‘You guys are not providing ferry service.’ That just irks me to no end.” –

    The lack of business sense, the inability shown by Mr. Halter to not being able to thoroughly think borough projects out, which end up wasting borough tax payer funds, before these projects are started, such as the Mat Su Ferry, a Hatcher Pass Ski Hill or a 8 million dollar Borough Building renovation in Palmer, is effecting our ability in the North End to get our dike, water and sewer system addressed. properly by Mat Su Borough in Talkeetna.

    Mr. Halter giving his “rubber stamp approval” to the “Good ol boys: Port Development, Rail Link, Knik Bridge or the Mat Su Ferry since he took office in 2010, then “blaming”: Anchorage for the lack of thorough planning for those projects being a fiscal failutre by Mat Su Borough, is ridiculous.

    Vern Halter, ignoring our “North End” of the Mat Su borough having “needs and borough responsibilities fulfilled” should be addressed. Anyone? Whitney?

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin